top of page

Common Errors in Metal Stamping Part Design (and How to Avoid Them)

  • ester1302
  • 6 days ago
  • 3 min read
Errores habituales en el diseño de piezas de estampación metálica. Imágen creada en elevenlabs

Introduction


More than 70% of cost overruns in metal stamping originate in the design phase. An excessively tight bending radius, an unnecessarily strict tolerance, or poorly selected material can turn a profitable project into a constant source of problems.

At TYRSA, with over 50 years of experience in tooling and metal stamping, we've seen how small changes in the initial design can save thousands of euros and weeks of delays. The secret? Applying Design for Manufacturing (DFM) criteria from the very first sketch.

Let's analyze the 7 most common errors and how to avoid them.



1. Ignoring the Stamping Process in Design


The problem: Designing while thinking only about the final function, without considering how the part will be manufactured.


Consequences:

  • Bending radii that are too small, causing cracking

  • Geometries impossible to form

  • Unplanned additional operations


How to avoid it:

  • Apply the basic rule: minimum radius = material thickness

  • Review the design with the manufacturer before building the die

  • Always ask: "How will this come out of the die?"



2. Inadequate Material or Thickness Selection


The problem: Choosing material based solely on theoretical criteria, without considering its formability.


Consequences:

  • Greater forming effort and die wear

  • Dimensional stability problems

  • Unnecessarily high cost per part


How to avoid it:

  • Select considering: function + process + production series

  • Consult the material's deep drawing characteristics

  • Don't oversize thickness if not necessary


Key data: Replacing structural steel with deep drawing steel can reduce forming effort by 30%.


Errores habituales en el diseño de piezas de estampación metálica. Imágen creada en Elevenlabs

3. Overly Strict Tolerances


The problem: Defining tolerances of ±0.05 mm across the entire part when only one or two dimensions are critical.


Consequences:

  • Die cost increase up to 40%

  • Reduced production speed

  • Higher rejection rate


How to avoid it:

  • Apply functional tolerances: only tighten where necessary

  • Differentiate critical zones (assemblies) from free zones

  • Follow standards like ISO 2768 for general tolerances


Practical rule: If a dimension doesn't affect assembly or function, use general tolerance.



4. Forgetting Part Ejection


The problem: A perfect design on paper that sticks to the die or deforms when ejected.


Consequences:

  • Sticking due to vacuum effect

  • Elastic deformation during extraction

  • High cycle times


How to avoid it:

  • Plan for slight tapers (1-3°) to facilitate extraction

  • Avoid deep concavities without exit

  • Consult about the most suitable ejection system



5. Overly Complex Designs for a Single Operation


The problem: Concentrating too many shapes and bends in a single press stroke.


Consequences:

  • Excessively complex and costly dies

  • Greater risk of breakdowns and stoppages

  • Difficulties maintaining tolerances


How to avoid it:

  • Divide the process into progressive operations

  • Simplify geometry without compromising function

  • Consider secondary operations outside the die


Shop floor reality: A small design change can reduce die cost by 20-30%.


Errores habituales en el diseño de piezas de estampación metálica. Imágen creada en Elevenlabs


6. Not Thinking About Die Life


The problem: Designing edges that are too thin or critical sections that stress the die.


Consequences:

  • Premature punch wear

  • Constant adjustments to maintain tolerances

  • Production stoppages for repairs


How to avoid it:

  • Design with adequate margins for punches

  • Avoid sharp corners that concentrate stress

  • Think in terms of hundreds of thousands of hits, not just the first part



7. Lack of Design-Manufacturing Collaboration


The most important of all. Most errors stem from lack of communication between designer and manufacturer.


When the manufacturer participates from the beginning:

  • Problems are detected before making the die

  • Alternatives that reduce costs are proposed

  • Later modifications are minimized


At TYRSA we work from the initial phase with our clients, applying our experience to ensure the design is manufacturable, efficient, and competitive.


Key data: Projects with prior DFM review reduce time to production by 40%.


Errores habituales en el diseño de piezas de estampación metálica. Imágen creada en Elevenlabs

Conclusion: How to avoid Common Errors in Metal Stamping Part Design


Good metal stamping design goes beyond the final shape. Considering the process, material, functional tolerances, and die life is key to achieving efficient and competitive parts.

At TYRSA we know that the best investment is reviewing the design before going into production.


Do you have a metal stamping project?

Our technical team can review your design and propose improvements that optimize cost, quality, and time.


Contact us:

📧 comercial@tyrsa.com | 📞 (+34) 93 460 98 00 | 🌐 www.tyrsa.es


Errores habituales en el diseño de piezas de estampación metálica. Imágen creada en Elevenlabs
Proceso, material, tolerancias, expulsión de la pieza, análisis continuo

Comments


bottom of page